Vercel integrations / Compare
Auth0 vs Supabase for Vercel
Where do they differ?
Both apps document the same things in the same way. The differences are in price, regions and setup below.
Side by side
| Auth0 | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Provisioning from Vercel | Yes | Yes |
| Install from the Vercel CLI | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic environment variables | Yes | Yes |
| Billing through Vercel | - | Yes |
| Single sign-on from Vercel | - | Yes |
| Per-preview environments | - | Yes |
| Price from (USD) | Free | Free |
| Regions | GLOBAL | GLOBAL |
| Minimum Vercel plan | any | any |
| Setup | Not reported | Not reported |
| Known limitations | The integration creates a new Auth0 tenant; existing Auth0 accounts need manual setup (moderate) Auth0 environment variables can only be configured for the production environment (moderate) Iframe embedding must be switched on manually for Universal Login (minor) | Supabase projects for a Vercel Marketplace organisation can only be created from the Vercel dashboard (moderate) Custom domains are not supported for Marketplace projects, and the Vercel environment variables always use the base Supabase URL (moderate) Owners cannot be added in the Supabase dashboard; the owner role is granted in Vercel (minor) Invoices and payments are handled in the Vercel dashboard, not in Supabase (minor) The Supabase organisation is removed only after all its projects are deleted and the integration is uninstalled (minor) Free plan projects pause after 1 week of inactivity (minor) |
| Vendor status | Listed | Listed |
| Facts verified | 13 Nov 2026 | 13 Nov 2026 |
No winner is declared: which is better depends on what you need. Every fact links to its sources on each app's page.