Vercel integrations / Compare
Convex vs Neon for Vercel
Where do they differ?
Both apps document the same things in the same way. The differences are in price, regions and setup below.
Side by side
| Convex | Neon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provisioning from Vercel | Yes | Yes |
| Install from the Vercel CLI | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic environment variables | - | Yes |
| Billing through Vercel | Yes | Yes |
| Single sign-on from Vercel | - | Yes |
| Per-preview environments | Yes | Yes |
| Agent skills | - | Yes |
| Price from (USD) | Free | Free |
| Regions | GLOBAL | GLOBAL |
| Minimum Vercel plan | any | any |
| Setup | Not reported | Not reported |
| Known limitations | Projects created through the Vercel Marketplace belong to their own separate Convex team (moderate) Preview backends do not share data with development or production (minor) | Neon's own project transfer feature cannot be used with a Vercel-managed organisation; a linked Neon project moves automatically when its Vercel project changes teams (minor) Plan, scaling and member changes must be made in the Vercel dashboard, not the Neon Console (minor) Preview database branches are only deleted when their Vercel deployment is removed, which follows Vercel's retention policy (6 months by default) (minor) The neon login CLI command does not work with Vercel-managed organisations, so CLI access needs an API key (minor) Neon describes its MCP server as for development and testing only, not production environments (minor) |
| Vendor status | Listed | Listed |
| Facts verified | 13 Nov 2026 | 13 Nov 2026 |
No winner is declared: which is better depends on what you need. Every fact links to its sources on each app's page.